Skip to content

Argireline (acetyl hexapeptide-8) user reports (25)

Glowing 2Positive 10Mixed 3Nothing 5Negative 3Bad reaction 2

25 reports

  • I ordered The Ordinary’s Argireline and apply it LIBERALLY twice a day. I am extremely stoked at these results but do believe there’s some beginner gains happening here

    • 272 points
    GlowingThe Ordinary Argireline 10%, liberally twice dailyTopicaldeep forehead lines

    39F, had Botox twice but found it too expensive; 2.5 weeks, B&A photos; suspects some hydration confounding

  • This duo totally changed my skin. Early 30s, so lines are minimal but saw big improvement in the forehead and 11 lines in 3x months of daily use 1-2x a day.

    • 15 points
    GlowingThe Ordinary Argireline + Matrixyl, 1-2x dailyTopicalforehead lines, 11s

    early 30s, 3 months of daily use with Matrixyl

  • It was only when I added Argireline and Matrixyl from the Ordinary into my routine that I noticed they started to go away!

    • 1,550 points
    PositiveArgireline twice daily, Matrixyl at night (The Ordinary)Topicalforehead fine lines

    24F, B&A after about a month; also on tretinoin, EGF serum and a red-light mask

  • I've been using argireline on my forehead for 10 days. It's not the exact same lighting but I tried to get as close as possible. It's not Botox results but for like $10 or whatever I'm pretty pleased.

    • 542 points
    PositiveThe Ordinary Argireline 10%Topicalforehead lines

    37F, 10 days, B&A photos

  • I have dynamic lines on my forehead and started using argireline and noticed results immediately. Not miraculous results. My lines haven't disappeared or anything. But some of them definitely diminished.

    • 102 points
    PositiveTopicaldynamic forehead lines

    early in use

  • I’ve been using the Argireline for about a month and I am definitely noticing a difference in the fine lines around my eyes. But you have to keep it up, it stops working as soon as you stop using it.

    • 34 points
    PositiveThe Ordinary Argireline 10%Topicaleye fine lines

    about a month of use

  • It has honestly helped me a lot, my mom noticed my smile lines and developing crows feet had been diminished... I think it's a great supplemental ingredient, but I don't think it's a show stopper on its own.

    • 18 points
    PositiveTopicalsmile lines, crow's feet

    also on a retinoid and exfoliants

  • Since I started argireline I can honestly say I last way longer in between Botox appointments. I used to go on the dot every 3 months/90 days now I can go almost 4 months-usually 3.5 months

    • 16 points
    PositiveThe Ordinary Argireline around eyes and forehead, Matrixyl all overTopicalcrow's feet, extending Botox

    1 year, decade-long Botox user

  • It works but it’s obviously not as good as Botox. I didn’t think it was working so I stopped after a bottle, wondered why I all of a sudden had wrinkles, went bought a new bottle ASAP.

    • 15 points
    PositiveTopicalfine lines

    stopped after one bottle and restarted

  • I just started using a couple weeks ago and it has a mini botox effect on me where I can’t easily lift my eyebrows

    • 15 points
    PositiveTopicaldynamic lines

    a couple of weeks in

  • I didn't think it was doing much till I stopped using it and noticed that my fine lines under my eyes were starting to get out of hand again, lol! It definitely helped me, but I think it depends on the person.

    • 10 points
    PositiveTopicalunder-eye fine lines

    noticed the effect only after stopping

  • I've gotten good results, I put a drop on my 11s and a drop above the outside of my eyebrows. If I overdo it, and put it over my whole forehead, I get a whopper of a headache.

    • 1 point
    Positiveone drop on 11s, one above each outer browTopical11s

    headache is dose/area dependent for her

  • It's not even remotely similar to Botox and I think advertising it that way does a disservice to argireline lol. I've used it in the past and liked it enough to finish the bottle, but not enough to repurchase.

    • 52 points
    MixedTopicalfine lines

    finished one bottle

  • It made a noticeable difference for the 11s between my eyebrows. I tried applying it to my forehead a couple of times and my eyes looked a bit weird. Almost as if my forehead was sagging.

    • 10 points
    MixedTopical11s, forehead

    unsure whether the sagging look was the product, allergies or new makeup

  • I tried The Ordinary and I did notice a difference in my forehead lines looking smoother but it also broke me out a little.

    • 4 points
    MixedThe Ordinary Argireline 10%Topicalforehead lines
  • I tried Argireline for a few months and it did absolute diddly squat. Went in for Botox and it worked perfectly.

    • 36 points
    NothingTopicalexpression lines

    a few months, then Botox, which worked

  • No headaches but also no discernible difference in my skin after using up an entire bottle.

    • 15 points
    NothingTopicalfine lines

    one full bottle

  • I actually stopped using it somewhat soon after posting this and my face today looks... the same as it did when I was using it. So make of that what you will!

    • 5 points
    NothingTopicalforehead and eye lines

    OP of the thread, ~1 year of use then stopped; kept up Botox

  • Made 0 difference for me. I have 11's lines... Edit: also the first time I used it the area felt cold and heavy and almost headachy. However never again since

    • 2 points
    NothingTopical11s, nasolabial fold
  • I wanted it to work but it doesn’t work for me. I went through an entire bottle giving it a chance and it just really doesn’t do anything noticeable.

    • 1 point
    NothingTopicalfine lines

    one full bottle

  • I (50F) am not expecting miracles from the Argireline Solution 10%, but after two weeks of consistent use, my 11s look worse!

    • 12 points
    NegativeThe Ordinary Argireline Solution 10%Topical11s

    50F, two weeks of consistent use

  • I also get a headache everytime I use Argireline. Some days it’s worse than others, but I decided it’s just not worth risking it because it can be kinda debilitating. It’s a bummer because it definitely makes a different in my fine lines.

    • 4 points
    NegativeTopicalfine lines

    stopped despite seeing results

  • I really wanted to love it, especially for my crows feet, but it gives me headaches every time I use it, I couldn’t bear it, I had to discontinue

    • 3 points
    NegativeTopicalcrow's feet

    says the ingredient itself, not fragrance, caused it; discontinued

  • A few days later I started to feel like I was having horrible seasonal allergies or possibly some sort of cold bug. It started off with headaches, which progressed to sinus and ear pressure along with a tender throat and neck.

    • 9 points
    Bad reactionThe Ordinary Argireline 10%Topical

    started a few days after beginning; eased when skipped, Benadryl helped; switched to Matrixyl without issues

  • I have the same symptoms as you and the same product , I look really badly around my eyes, also my neck... I could not open my eyes properly for around two days so far.

    • 2 points
    Bad reactionThe Ordinary Argireline 10%Topical

    says she rarely reacts to anything

Research notes, not medical advice. Updated .

Sequence

The peptide's chain of amino acids from its start (the N-terminus) to its end, one bead and one letter for each: A alanine, C cysteine, D aspartic acid, E glutamic acid, F phenylalanine, G glycine, H histidine, I isoleucine, K lysine, L leucine, M methionine, N asparagine, P proline, Q glutamine, R arginine, S serine, T threonine, V valine, W tryptophan, Y tyrosine. A modification such as an N-acetyl cap or a C-terminal amide changes how long it lasts in the body. Length tells related peptides apart, from a two-residue dipeptide like carnosine to a 43-residue protein like thymosin beta-4, and predicts neither effect nor safety.

Report grades

Every first-hand Reddit or X report is graded on its own, from glowing through positive, mixed, nothing and negative to bad reaction, and the bar shows how those grades split. Posts that look vendor-adjacent stay on the peptide's page but are left out of the counts.

GlowingPositiveMixedNothingNegativeBad reaction

% positive

The share of a peptide's graded Reddit and X reports that are glowing or positive, vendor-adjacent posts left out. A peptide with few reports is pulled toward the average of all reports, as if it had eight average ones besides its own, so two glowing posts cannot top the list. Peptides rank by this figure, those with no graded report yet after those with one, and Avoid ones after every other entry.

Researcher estimate

No first-hand report of this peptide has been graded yet, so the figure is the researchers' own rating out of 10 from what they read about it. It ranks after every peptide with graded reports until its own arrive.

Safety tier

Each peptide is tiered Clean, Caution or Avoid from its five risk axes under the chosen safety bar. An Avoid peptide carries a real risk of harm, a plausible route to serious harm rather than mere unpleasantness, so it stays listed with the reason but ranks behind every other entry, however good its reviews.

Safety bar

The safety bar sets how much risk it takes to rate a peptide Avoid. Strict: out on any serious mechanism with little human data, or any documented serious harm. Balanced: out on documented serious harm (unless it is obvious, reversible and from a regulated product), or a serious mechanism whose harm would be silent with no human data at all. Evidence only: out only on documented serious harm in humans that is lasting, delayed or from grey-market product.

Seen harm

Documented serious adverse events in humans, from 0 for none despite real exposure to 3 for deaths or several well-documented serious harms. Serious means a hospital or emergency visit or harm lasting weeks, so a headache or a bad night does not count.

Mechanism

A plausible biological route to serious harm at the doses people use, such as growth-factor signalling, hormone-axis suppression, heart or blood-pressure effects or immune activation. It runs from 0 when none is known to 3 when a dangerous pathway has been shown in living animals.

Data gap

How little human safety data exists for the molecule actually sold, from 0 for an approved drug with large trials and years of use to 3 for no human safety data at all. A modified analogue does not inherit its parent's trials.

Silent harm

Whether the feared harm would show quickly or stay hidden, from 0 when it is obvious and goes on stopping to 3 when it is silent and delayed, like tumour promotion or slow organ damage. User reports cannot reveal a harm that takes years to appear, so a high score here limits what good reviews can tell you.

Product

The risk of what people actually buy, from 0 for a regulated pharmacy or supplement product taken by mouth or on the skin to 3 for a grey-market injectable. In one dataset of 6,441 grey-market samples, 42–71% failed basic quality criteria and 15% carried endotoxin; taken by mouth or in the nose, a pack avoids the injection risks.

Evidence

The strongest kind of study behind the peptide's effects, from an approved drug through human controlled trials and small human studies to animal work or nothing of its own. Animal results often fail to carry over to people.

Access

How people get it: as an approved drug, a compounded prescription, an over-the-counter supplement or from the grey market, where nobody checks the vial. The channel decides both the legal position and the risk of a bad batch.

Price per month

Thirty days of the typical dose, from its low end to its high end, priced at the listing a careful buyer would choose: in stock, from a shop scoring 4 of 5 on trust (third-party tested where no score is set), failing that 3, a pure pack before a blend, a European shop first, then the cheapest per mg. The range is the dose's, not the shops'. A per-dose amount counts once a day unless the dose says otherwise. The shop table keeps each listing's price per mg, per gram for bulk supplements. Where no listing can be priced the researchers' own estimate stands in, and says so.

Dose users report

The middle half of the daily doses stated in at least five first-hand reports, vendor posts left out. Where its middle sits more than twice above or below the declared dose, the month is priced at it as well, since what people take is what they pay for.

Shop trust

Each shop's trust on a 1–5 scale, read from its testing and its reputation: 1 for serious red flags (fabricated COAs, scam reports, impersonation, a closed shop), 2 for no public testing, a new shop or active complaints such as seized parcels, 3 for its own COAs or a short track record, 4 for verified third-party testing or a strong reputation, and 5 for third-party batch reports that name the shop, with years of good independent reputation. A shop without a score counts third-party batch testing as 4, its own COAs as 3 and no public tests as 2.

Best value

Within a category or a goal, a peptide that no other beats on both counts: none is rated more positively for the same or a lower monthly price, and none costs less for the same or a higher rating. The chart joins these into the best-value line; the cheapest of them and the best-rated of them both make it, so the line spans the trade-off from cheap to best. Avoid entries never count, and a peptide needs both a % positive and a price to be compared.

Testing

Whether the shop publishes lab results: third-party tested means an independent lab checks each batch, own COA means the shop's own certificate of analysis, and no public tests means neither. A certificate shows purity, not safety.

Added peptide

Some packs sold under one peptide's name hold a second one, such as 5 mg GHK-Cu in a nasal kit, stated only in the description. Sprayed in the nose or injected it reaches the blood like an injection, so it carries the risk of that route and is tiered as the injectable form, whatever its tier on the skin. A pack whose page gives no contents list may hold more than its name.