Skip to content

Biotinoyl tripeptide-1 (Procapil) & Capixyl hair serums user reports (25)

Positive 10Mixed 5Nothing 5Negative 3Bad reaction 2

25 reports

  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    I wished I had better pictures but I definitely see an improvement. It looks like I have more baby hairs but actually I think they are my existing hair but just thicker.

    • 137 points
    PositiveTopicalperimenopausal sheddingLate-40s woman, 10 weeks of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density 3-4 days a week.
  • r/tressless

    Personally, I think my hair looks noticeably fuller now, especially around the crown. It also seems healthier and denser overall.

    • 21 points
    PositiveTopicalcrown thinning30M, two bottles of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density as his only treatment (no minoxidil/finasteride).
  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    I saw significant difference after finishing 2 bottles (everyday consistent use)

    • 7 points
    PositiveTopicalpersistent loss after a past eating disorderThread author; 3 bottles of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density daily, plus multivitamins and better sleep.
  • r/hairgrowth

    Works for me, but I use it almost daily! Took a good 3 months of consistent use to start noticing. My temples filled in and I started sprouting lots of baby hairs.

    • 7 points
    PositiveTopicaltemple thinningThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density almost daily.
  • r/tressless

    I ran a little experiment with it where I was on it for 6 months, then off for 6 and now I am back on for 2. I can conclude that personally it helped me tremendously in the 6 months that I used it

    • 5 points
    PositiveTopicalmale pattern hair lossOn/off experiment with The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density (6 months on, 6 off, back on) alongside finasteride.
  • r/Haircare

    I have been using it for a year and after 4-5 months I saw a huge amount of regrowth. However, this doesn’t prevent hairloss.

    • 4 points
    PositiveTopicalfine, thinning hairA year of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density; lost the regrowth in a shedding season while using it irregularly, regained it after.
  • r/tressless

    I used a spray that contains %3 procapil for like 5 months. Results weren't unreal but it thickened up my hairline and my friend also noticed the regrowth but then i stopped using it and all gains lost in like one-two months

    • 2 points
    Positive3% Procapil sprayTopicalreceding hairline5 months of a 3% Procapil spray, no other treatment mentioned.
  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    I've been the Ordinary serum for the past few weeks. Can't speak to regrowth yet but I have definitely noticed less hair shedding.

    • 1 point
    PositiveTopicalhair fallA few weeks of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density added to spironolactone 50 mg and 5% minoxidil, which had not controlled the shedding.
  • r/tressless

    I have enough hair on my temples now that I don't have to use any hair fibers, and my hair definitely looks thicker now in comparison to before.

    • 1 point
    PositiveTopicalchronic telogen effluviumThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density daily on temples 5+ months; minoxidil had not worked.
  • r/hairgrowth

    my hair is twice if not 3x more dense and full. Where my temples used to thin/bald is now full of baby hairs and growing sections

    • 1 point
    PositiveTopicalrecovery from extension and bleach damageA year of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density after removing extensions and stopping bleaching, which also explains much of the recovery.
  • r/Naturalhair

    I do think the product is working to grow back my edges, but at what cost🫠

    • 17 points
    MixedTopicaledgesA few months of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density on natural hair, washed weekly.
  • r/tressless

    I feel like it almost instantly made my hair feel thicker and healthier but I don’t know that it ever did much in terms of regrowth. Used for maybe 4 months

    • 13 points
    MixedTopicalmale pattern hair lossAbout 4 months of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density.
  • r/hairgrowth

    It works!! I have a bunch of baby hairs growing in around my hairline but I had to stop using because it irritated my scalp :(

    • 3 points
    MixedTopicalhairlineThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density; worked but stopped because of irritation.
  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    I have regrowths from using it, but doesn’t help with hair loss, I still have hair falling out a lot but I see regrowths so better than none.

    • 2 points
    MixedTopicalhair loss (cannot use minoxidil)The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density applied diligently section by section; minoxidil flares her seborrhoeic dermatitis.
  • r/tressless

    However - I used it daily for about 4 months prior to starting to minoxidil and did not notice any regrowth or improvements in hair thickness

    • 2 points
    MixedTopicalfemale pattern hair lossThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density daily for 4 months before minoxidil, now once a week.
  • r/hairgrowth

    I saw rave reviews but have to be honest it did nothing for me:/

    • 31 points
    NothingTopicalthinning hairOne bottle of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density, almost daily; hair worse overall, which she puts down to stress.
  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    I used this for my hairline and temples every night for at least three months, and I honestly didn't see any improvement.

    • 5 points
    NothingTopicalhairline and templesThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density nightly for 3+ months.
  • r/tressless

    USED THIS FOR 2 YEARS... DID NOTHING.

    • 3 points
    NothingTopicalhair thinningThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density for 2 years, repurchased many times, alongside Rogaine foam.
  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    I used it for over a year. The only benefit is that it makes your hair feel soft and fluffy, no actual hair growth.

    • 3 points
    NothingTopicalhair lossThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density for over a year.
  • r/tressless

    I’m on my third bottle of the stuff. Haven’t seen much movement but I want to use it for about a year before I write it off.

    • 1 point
    NothingTopicalhair thinningThird bottle of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density, applied liberally; plans a full year before judging.
  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    I feel as though my hair loss has visibly progressed since using it, a bit quicker than it has been, however, it hasn’t caused any irritation or redness or anything. I’m on week 10 of daily use.

    • 2 points
    NegativeTopicalfemale hair loss3 bottles / ~12 weeks of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density daily with scalp massage and pumpkin seed oil; stopped after itch and spots.
  • r/FemaleHairLoss

    But i noticed after 3 weeks that i had started to lose more hair than usual, in the shower i would usually lose 5-10 hairs but after the serum i started losing 30+.

    • 1 point
    NegativeTopicalhair fall2-3 weeks of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density together with Kérastase Genesis serum.
  • r/hairgrowth

    It did nothing noticeable for me except make my scalp itch.

    • 1 point
    NegativeTopicalhair growthThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density.
  • r/Naturalhair

    I tried it but it gave me intense headaches especially if I rubbed it in..and I’m not a person that gets headaches at all.

    • 5 points
    Bad reactionTopicalhair growthThe Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density; returned it, could only tolerate a tiny amount.
  • r/TheOrdinarySkincare

    about two hours after i started to experience rapid/irregular heartbeat, very bad dizziness, and veins dilating back and fourth.

    • 1 point
    Bad reactiona full dropper (label says a few drops)Topicalhair thickeningSecond day of The Ordinary Multi-Peptide Serum for Hair Density at a large dose; had a similar reaction to a pre-workout, so caffeine or vasodilator sensitivity is the likely cause.
Research notes, not medical advice. Updated .

Sequence

The peptide's chain of amino acids from its start (the N-terminus) to its end, one bead and one letter for each: A alanine, C cysteine, D aspartic acid, E glutamic acid, F phenylalanine, G glycine, H histidine, I isoleucine, K lysine, L leucine, M methionine, N asparagine, P proline, Q glutamine, R arginine, S serine, T threonine, V valine, W tryptophan, Y tyrosine. A modification such as an N-acetyl cap or a C-terminal amide changes how long it lasts in the body. Length tells related peptides apart, from a two-residue dipeptide like carnosine to a 43-residue protein like thymosin beta-4, and predicts neither effect nor safety.

Report grades

Every first-hand Reddit or X report is graded on its own, from glowing through positive, mixed, nothing and negative to bad reaction, and the bar shows how those grades split. Posts that look vendor-adjacent stay on the peptide's page but are left out of the counts.

GlowingPositiveMixedNothingNegativeBad reaction

% positive

The share of a peptide's graded Reddit and X reports that are glowing or positive, vendor-adjacent posts left out. A peptide with few reports is pulled toward the average of all reports, as if it had eight average ones besides its own, so two glowing posts cannot top the list. Peptides rank by this figure, those with no graded report yet after those with one, and Avoid ones after every other entry.

Researcher estimate

No first-hand report of this peptide has been graded yet, so the figure is the researchers' own rating out of 10 from what they read about it. It ranks after every peptide with graded reports until its own arrive.

Safety tier

Each peptide is tiered Clean, Caution or Avoid from its five risk axes under the chosen safety bar. An Avoid peptide carries a real risk of harm, a plausible route to serious harm rather than mere unpleasantness, so it stays listed with the reason but ranks behind every other entry, however good its reviews.

Safety bar

The safety bar sets how much risk it takes to rate a peptide Avoid. Strict: out on any serious mechanism with little human data, or any documented serious harm. Balanced: out on documented serious harm (unless it is obvious, reversible and from a regulated product), or a serious mechanism whose harm would be silent with no human data at all. Evidence only: out only on documented serious harm in humans that is lasting, delayed or from grey-market product.

Seen harm

Documented serious adverse events in humans, from 0 for none despite real exposure to 3 for deaths or several well-documented serious harms. Serious means a hospital or emergency visit or harm lasting weeks, so a headache or a bad night does not count.

Mechanism

A plausible biological route to serious harm at the doses people use, such as growth-factor signalling, hormone-axis suppression, heart or blood-pressure effects or immune activation. It runs from 0 when none is known to 3 when a dangerous pathway has been shown in living animals.

Data gap

How little human safety data exists for the molecule actually sold, from 0 for an approved drug with large trials and years of use to 3 for no human safety data at all. A modified analogue does not inherit its parent's trials.

Silent harm

Whether the feared harm would show quickly or stay hidden, from 0 when it is obvious and goes on stopping to 3 when it is silent and delayed, like tumour promotion or slow organ damage. User reports cannot reveal a harm that takes years to appear, so a high score here limits what good reviews can tell you.

Product

The risk of what people actually buy, from 0 for a regulated pharmacy or supplement product taken by mouth or on the skin to 3 for a grey-market injectable. In one dataset of 6,441 grey-market samples, 42–71% failed basic quality criteria and 15% carried endotoxin; taken by mouth or in the nose, a pack avoids the injection risks.

Evidence

The strongest kind of study behind the peptide's effects, from an approved drug through human controlled trials and small human studies to animal work or nothing of its own. Animal results often fail to carry over to people.

Access

How people get it: as an approved drug, a compounded prescription, an over-the-counter supplement or from the grey market, where nobody checks the vial. The channel decides both the legal position and the risk of a bad batch.

Price per month

Thirty days of the typical dose, from its low end to its high end, priced at the listing a careful buyer would choose: in stock, from a shop scoring 4 of 5 on trust (third-party tested where no score is set), failing that 3, a pure pack before a blend, a European shop first, then the cheapest per mg. The range is the dose's, not the shops'. A per-dose amount counts once a day unless the dose says otherwise. The shop table keeps each listing's price per mg, per gram for bulk supplements. Where no listing can be priced the researchers' own estimate stands in, and says so.

Dose users report

The middle half of the daily doses stated in at least five first-hand reports, vendor posts left out. Where its middle sits more than twice above or below the declared dose, the month is priced at it as well, since what people take is what they pay for.

Shop trust

Each shop's trust on a 1–5 scale, read from its testing and its reputation: 1 for serious red flags (fabricated COAs, scam reports, impersonation, a closed shop), 2 for no public testing, a new shop or active complaints such as seized parcels, 3 for its own COAs or a short track record, 4 for verified third-party testing or a strong reputation, and 5 for third-party batch reports that name the shop, with years of good independent reputation. A shop without a score counts third-party batch testing as 4, its own COAs as 3 and no public tests as 2.

Best value

Within a category or a goal, a peptide that no other beats on both counts: none is rated more positively for the same or a lower monthly price, and none costs less for the same or a higher rating. The chart joins these into the best-value line; the cheapest of them and the best-rated of them both make it, so the line spans the trade-off from cheap to best. Avoid entries never count, and a peptide needs both a % positive and a price to be compared.

Testing

Whether the shop publishes lab results: third-party tested means an independent lab checks each batch, own COA means the shop's own certificate of analysis, and no public tests means neither. A certificate shows purity, not safety.

Added peptide

Some packs sold under one peptide's name hold a second one, such as 5 mg GHK-Cu in a nasal kit, stated only in the description. Sprayed in the nose or injected it reaches the blood like an injection, so it carries the risk of that route and is tiered as the injectable form, whatever its tier on the skin. A pack whose page gives no contents list may hold more than its name.