Skip to content

LL-37 user reports (27)

Glowing 4Positive 10Mixed 4Nothing 2Negative 4Bad reaction 2

27 reports

  • Antibiotics were working, introduce the LL-37 and within 3 weeks the infection cleared. I used it on half dose to avoid a bad flu that was going round but it cleared up my athletes foot like no other cream before, 3 months in and I'm still all clear

    • 2 points
    GlowingInjection

    own athlete's foot, plus a relative's cellulitis foot infection already on antibiotics; half dose

  • Killed all the nad crap. Was a rough ride for 5 weeks. Tongue got pink again, no more bloating and all the other crap that comes with h pylori , sibo and candida

    • 2 points
    GlowingGutInjection5 weeks

    H. pylori, SIBO, candida and mould exposure; stacked with BPC-157

  • Healed my Bad breath that i had for 14 years. Did keto and ll-37. im kind of in the State to start a second course because i reintroduced way to fast

    • 1 point
    GlowingGut500 mcg/day20-day course

    candida/gut dysbiosis, combined with a keto diet

  • Helped me to cure chronic sinusitis, I was so tired of using antibiotics every month! Used in spray, 200 mcg daily, reconstituted with colloid silver water

    • 1 point
    Glowing200 mcg/dayNasal

    chronic sinusitis; spray made up with colloidal silver water

  • I’ve had some luck with controlling my outbreaks with peptide therapy, specifically LL-37.

    • 8 points
    Positive

    HSV-1; taken twice a day when a flare starts, alongside vagus-nerve exercises

  • Took it a few years ago for around a month. Worked well for those battling with dysbiosis but probably needs multiple cycles. Paired it with TA1

    • 5 points
    PositiveGutabout a month

    dysbiosis, paired with thymosin alpha-1

  • I have Lichen Sclerosis and although I haven't had a flare-up since doing an 8 week cycle - it's too early for me to call it

    • 2 points
    Positive8-week cycle

    lichen sclerosus (autoimmune); low and slow to avoid herx; the user says it is too early to call

  • I actually think it helped me fight off a low grade infection that I’ve had for years. I don’t have any bad reactions and I read the study that was just shared. Short term use and low doses seems the safest.

    • 2 points
    Positive

    short course at low dose

  • LL37 is great for colonized mold, Lyme cysts and I believe bad bacteria and viruses too. It has definitely gone after the fungus in my lungs. Day 1 of injecting it and I had die off.

    • 2 points
    PositiveInjectionsecond round (first one 2 years earlier)

    colonised Aspergillus; stacked with thymosin alpha-1, TB-4, KPV/BPC-157 and daily HBOT

  • It's hard to separate the SS-31 and the LL-37 as I resumed taking SS-31 very shortly before beginning LL-37, but I think I have more energy than last time I was taking SS-31. I think it's likely the LL-37 is helping.

    • 1 point
    PositiveEnergy3 weeks

    ME/CFS; restarted SS-31 at the same time

  • Personally I had the positive effects of killing off whatever critters were making me crave sugar like it was a drug.

    • 1 point
    PositiveGut
  • I've already taken it before and I'm taking it again now and I will continue to take it in the future. Nothing negative to report

    • 1 point
    Positive

    replying to a post about an Alzheimer's-progression study

  • Dont feel compelled to use a certain dose as there is no such thing. The doses are all just made up. So use what you can tolerate. I used 1mg and it worked great.

    • 1 point
    Positive1 mg

    advice to someone who reacted badly: lower the dose

  • Increased herx responses and better looking live blood tests. Was doing in combination with daily herbs, bi-weekly IVs (nano copper/silver, NAC, Resveratrol, etc), and Thymosin Alpha 1 peptide (5 days a week).

    • 1 point
    Positive~125 mcg/day, 30 days on / 30 off3 cycles over a year

    chronic Lyme; heavily confounded with herbs, IVs and thymosin alpha-1

  • First day got bad die off which made me feel fluish and gave me vertigo. Then after that agitation after my night shot for a couple of days. But on the positive I usually get really depressed during the full moon. Not this month.

    • 3 points
    MixedGut100 mcg twice daily1 week

    candida

  • It's been a long road so far, with a lot of ups and downs. I'd say a little bit better, depending on the situation.

    • 2 points
    MixedGut

    SIBO

  • Felt like I had to flu for 3-4 days. Then things leveled out. It definitely knocked something’s back but unfortunately did not cure me.

    • 1 point
    Mixed3-4 months

    chronic Lyme; went on to ozone and herbal protocols

  • I started it about 4 weeks ago after the first two doses Istarted having some herxing. I lowered my dose and it has improved. I am also taking a couple other peptides my symptoms are improving.

    • 1 point
    Mixed4 weeks

    Lyme; started after 30 days of doxycycline, with other peptides and Buhner herbs

  • I have tried all 3, oral and injected BPC157 and noticed no difference from any of them on gut symptoms.

    • 3 points
    NothingGut

    SIBO gut symptoms; also tried KPV and BPC-157

  • Unfortunately it didn’t help me at all :(

    • 2 points
    Nothing

    Lyme; prescribed by a California doctor

  • I’m 2 weeks in 250mcg daily of it under a protocol with a doctor. I’ve felt a general “off” feeling, I’d say my brain fog is also at its absolute worst.

    • 2 points
    Negative250 mcg/day2 weeks

    doctor-run protocol for high mycotoxin and heavy-metal labs

  • LL increased my inflammation & with knees and joints it made & caused sleepless painful nights. I did try it 2 times: For me LL wasn’t helpful.

    • 2 points
    NegativeGut2 tries
  • I didn’t herx from the ta1 or kpv. I believe it was the ll-37 causing that. I backed off on the amount I was taking and the herx reaction got better.

    • 1 point
    Negative

    mould colonisation; also on TA1, BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu, KPV

  • Just started LL-37 last night and I woke up having some joint pains, achyness, and some burning on my body is it possible this is related?

    • 1 point
    Negative1 dose
  • After being sick for 2 weeks I decided to tap into the LL-37 in hopes I could force the virus out. The next 3 days felt like I should've been on hospice lol.

    • 3 points
    Bad reaction

    taken after two weeks of a viral illness

  • I dosed it twice at very low doses and after the second dose I woke up the next morning with my face so swollen I could barely see. It took a week to go away and damaged the moisture barrier on my face.

    • 2 points
    Bad reactionvery low (2 then 6 units of a 3 ml vial)2 doses
  • Within 5 hours of that injection, I got slammed with body aches to the level of "herx", and LL-37 has a known side effect of causing this by too big of a cytokine response.

    • 6 points
    NegativeInjection2 dosesvendor-adjacent

    taken at the first sign of an infection

Research notes, not medical advice. Updated .

Sequence

The peptide's chain of amino acids from its start (the N-terminus) to its end, one bead and one letter for each: A alanine, C cysteine, D aspartic acid, E glutamic acid, F phenylalanine, G glycine, H histidine, I isoleucine, K lysine, L leucine, M methionine, N asparagine, P proline, Q glutamine, R arginine, S serine, T threonine, V valine, W tryptophan, Y tyrosine. A modification such as an N-acetyl cap or a C-terminal amide changes how long it lasts in the body. Length tells related peptides apart, from a two-residue dipeptide like carnosine to a 43-residue protein like thymosin beta-4, and predicts neither effect nor safety.

Report grades

Every first-hand Reddit or X report is graded on its own, from glowing through positive, mixed, nothing and negative to bad reaction, and the bar shows how those grades split. Posts that look vendor-adjacent stay on the peptide's page but are left out of the counts.

GlowingPositiveMixedNothingNegativeBad reaction

% positive

The share of a peptide's graded Reddit and X reports that are glowing or positive, vendor-adjacent posts left out. A peptide with few reports is pulled toward the average of all reports, as if it had eight average ones besides its own, so two glowing posts cannot top the list. Peptides rank by this figure, those with no graded report yet after those with one, and Avoid ones after every other entry.

Researcher estimate

No first-hand report of this peptide has been graded yet, so the figure is the researchers' own rating out of 10 from what they read about it. It ranks after every peptide with graded reports until its own arrive.

Safety tier

Each peptide is tiered Clean, Caution or Avoid from its five risk axes under the chosen safety bar. An Avoid peptide carries a real risk of harm, a plausible route to serious harm rather than mere unpleasantness, so it stays listed with the reason but ranks behind every other entry, however good its reviews.

Safety bar

The safety bar sets how much risk it takes to rate a peptide Avoid. Strict: out on any serious mechanism with little human data, or any documented serious harm. Balanced: out on documented serious harm (unless it is obvious, reversible and from a regulated product), or a serious mechanism whose harm would be silent with no human data at all. Evidence only: out only on documented serious harm in humans that is lasting, delayed or from grey-market product.

Seen harm

Documented serious adverse events in humans, from 0 for none despite real exposure to 3 for deaths or several well-documented serious harms. Serious means a hospital or emergency visit or harm lasting weeks, so a headache or a bad night does not count.

Mechanism

A plausible biological route to serious harm at the doses people use, such as growth-factor signalling, hormone-axis suppression, heart or blood-pressure effects or immune activation. It runs from 0 when none is known to 3 when a dangerous pathway has been shown in living animals.

Data gap

How little human safety data exists for the molecule actually sold, from 0 for an approved drug with large trials and years of use to 3 for no human safety data at all. A modified analogue does not inherit its parent's trials.

Silent harm

Whether the feared harm would show quickly or stay hidden, from 0 when it is obvious and goes on stopping to 3 when it is silent and delayed, like tumour promotion or slow organ damage. User reports cannot reveal a harm that takes years to appear, so a high score here limits what good reviews can tell you.

Product

The risk of what people actually buy, from 0 for a regulated pharmacy or supplement product taken by mouth or on the skin to 3 for a grey-market injectable. In one dataset of 6,441 grey-market samples, 42–71% failed basic quality criteria and 15% carried endotoxin; taken by mouth or in the nose, a pack avoids the injection risks.

Evidence

The strongest kind of study behind the peptide's effects, from an approved drug through human controlled trials and small human studies to animal work or nothing of its own. Animal results often fail to carry over to people.

Access

How people get it: as an approved drug, a compounded prescription, an over-the-counter supplement or from the grey market, where nobody checks the vial. The channel decides both the legal position and the risk of a bad batch.

Price per month

Thirty days of the typical dose, from its low end to its high end, priced at the listing a careful buyer would choose: in stock, from a shop scoring 4 of 5 on trust (third-party tested where no score is set), failing that 3, a pure pack before a blend, a European shop first, then the cheapest per mg. The range is the dose's, not the shops'. A per-dose amount counts once a day unless the dose says otherwise. The shop table keeps each listing's price per mg, per gram for bulk supplements. Where no listing can be priced the researchers' own estimate stands in, and says so.

Dose users report

The middle half of the daily doses stated in at least five first-hand reports, vendor posts left out. Where its middle sits more than twice above or below the declared dose, the month is priced at it as well, since what people take is what they pay for.

Shop trust

Each shop's trust on a 1–5 scale, read from its testing and its reputation: 1 for serious red flags (fabricated COAs, scam reports, impersonation, a closed shop), 2 for no public testing, a new shop or active complaints such as seized parcels, 3 for its own COAs or a short track record, 4 for verified third-party testing or a strong reputation, and 5 for third-party batch reports that name the shop, with years of good independent reputation. A shop without a score counts third-party batch testing as 4, its own COAs as 3 and no public tests as 2.

Best value

Within a category or a goal, a peptide that no other beats on both counts: none is rated more positively for the same or a lower monthly price, and none costs less for the same or a higher rating. The chart joins these into the best-value line; the cheapest of them and the best-rated of them both make it, so the line spans the trade-off from cheap to best. Avoid entries never count, and a peptide needs both a % positive and a price to be compared.

Testing

Whether the shop publishes lab results: third-party tested means an independent lab checks each batch, own COA means the shop's own certificate of analysis, and no public tests means neither. A certificate shows purity, not safety.

Added peptide

Some packs sold under one peptide's name hold a second one, such as 5 mg GHK-Cu in a nasal kit, stated only in the description. Sprayed in the nose or injected it reaches the blood like an injection, so it carries the risk of that route and is tiered as the injectable form, whatever its tier on the skin. A pack whose page gives no contents list may hold more than its name.