Skip to content

SYN-AKE (dipeptide diaminobutyroyl benzylamide diacetate) user reports (20)

Positive 11Mixed 1Nothing 5Negative 1

20 reports

  • I think the syn-ake peptide gave better results on my skin - it regenerated beautifully and was definitely firmer and softer to the touch.

    • 8 points
    PositiveTopical

    compared three peptides at night; preferred SYN-AKE, copper peptides did nothing for her

  • for me the two peptides that i absolutely swear by are Argireline and Syn-Ake ... been using products with these ingredients for years and i dont have wrinkles

    • 8 points
    PositiveTopical

    always paired with argireline (favourite product Revision Revox Line Relaxer), so not attributable to SYN-AKE alone

  • The SYN-AKE Power 10 Effector by It's Skin is really cheap and I liked the way it smoothed and tightened skin.

    • 7 points
    PositiveTopicalanti-aging

    It's Skin Power 10 SYN-AKE effector

  • I have not experienced any reactions with SYN-AKE - but no overnight miracles, either.

    • 6 points
    PositivePurebess cream with 4% SYN-AKE raw materialTopicalmature skin

    42; uses several peptides alongside acids for six months, so not attributable to SYN-AKE alone

  • I have actually the famous syn-ake brands- Rodial Glamoxy snake serum but keep it mind that it is western and AB are way too 'gentle' . It does keep the wrinkles stay put for 5 hours but I will say the effect is just temporary. More like temporary botox.

    • 4 points
    PositiveTopicalexpression wrinkles

    Rodial Glamoxy snake serum (SYN-AKE is the named active); effect temporary

  • Syn-ake is so <3 I'd marry it.

    • 2 points
    PositiveTopical

    Dermal SYN-AKE sheet mask plus It's Skin Power 10 SYN-AKE (author since deleted)

  • Although I didn't like the mask fit (the hydrogel was too stiff for some reason and didn't adhere as well as it should have), or was really fantastic at plumping, firming, and brightening my skin and definitely did temporarily relax some of the fine squinting lines under my eyes.

    • 2 points
    PositiveTopical

    35; Botanic Farm SYN-AKE hydrogel mask, single use

  • I had a few samples of it and every time I used it I woke up looking fresh and my under eye lines plumped up. In general my skin really glowed. I have no idea if it's really the syn-ake itself or the other ingredients

    • 2 points
    PositiveTopical

    samples of Dr. Pharm SYN-AKE Gold Cream; she could not find the ingredient list and doubts it was the SYN-AKE

  • I only use it on my forehead and 11 lines. I haven't had dramatic/instant results, but I can see a difference the longer I use it. A little goes a long way, I only use two drops.

    • 2 points
    Positivetwo dropsTopicalforehead and glabellar lines

    It's Skin Power 10 Formula SYN-AKE ampoule, about six weeks

  • I like the dermal syn-ake masks to plump skin up temporarily. It also has a sort of cooling feeling which makes me think it's numbing my face (it's not, movement is fine) or "relaxing" the wrinkles.

    • 1 point
    PositiveTopical

    Dermal SYN-AKE sheet masks; says the hydration boost hiding fine lines lasts about two days

  • I used the Spot Effector every day for over a month. I saw a really nice difference with it! My undereye fine lines are quite stubborn, given that they "reinforce" every time I blink, but I definitely saw a noticeable difference in skin tightness.

    • 1 point
    PositiveTopicalunder-eye lines

    Holika Holika SYN-AKE Spot Effector daily for over a month; Tony Moly SYN-AKE eye masks gave only temporary results

  • I am a believer in topical peptides with "Botox-like" effect, such as Argireline. However, I've had better experience with Argireline or so it seems than with Syn-ake. Maybe it's a placebo effect, but I did a dermal sheet mask with syn-ake, and it does feel a little numb.

    • 5 points
    MixedTopicalaugmenting Botox

    regular Botox user; found argireline better; a later comment says they 'work somewhat' but are hard to judge on top of Botox

  • *Tosowoong Syn-ake Natural Pure Essence: harmless but didn't do anything *Secret Key Syn-Ake Anti-Wrinkle Ampoule: didn't do anything

    • 3 points
    NothingTopicalanti-aging

    of three SYN-AKE products only Giverny's cream was 'ok' (rich, not brightening); two named SYN-AKE products did nothing. Her favourite in the comment, Mizon S-Venom, is not counted because its active is not identifiable

  • I'm currently using Secret Key SYN-AKE Anti-Wrinkle and Whitening Eye Cream (45, combo skin with normal cheeks/oily t-zone). I can't really say that I think the cream is particularly effective for hydrating or brightening.

    • 3 points
    NothingTopicaleye area

    Secret Key SYN-AKE eye cream; 45, combination skin

  • I'm pretty 'whatever' about it. I wont re-buy it. It's not bad in any way my skin tolerated it fine. And I guess it did ad a little moisture, but I didn't see or feel any noticeable difference.

    • 2 points
    NothingTopical

    It's Skin Power 10 SYN-AKE ampoule; won't rebuy

  • I have a few sheet masks with syn-ake. It felt slightly tingly on me but I didn't see any visible results. My friend used the same masks and her skin looked better/smoother. A definite ymmv scenario.

    • 2 points
    NothingTopicalanti-aging

    SYN-AKE sheet masks

  • Same, I tried the skin79 mask and noticed nothing in particular in my face.

    • 2 points
    NothingTopicalanti-aging

    Skin79 SYN-AKE sheet mask, in reply to the comment above

  • My face started to feel numb freaked me out so I washed it off I don’t think it’s placebo effect! Not going to use it again!

    • 1 point
    NegativeTopical

    product not named (a replier asked whether it was DIY powder); stopped after one use

  • Someone mentioned Cellexia's wrinkle filler gel has syn-ake and matrixyl 3000 so I grabbed it based on good reviews Holy shit the difference at week 3.

    • 30 points
    GlowingTopicalvendor-adjacent

    Cellexia wrinkle filler gel (SYN-AKE plus Matrixyl 3000); the top reply (52 upvotes) says it reads like an ad

  • My skin did end up feeling really soft, smooth, and moisturized and had a 'bouncy' feeling when I poked my cheek, but definitely no brightening effects.

    • 1 point
    MixedTopicalvendor-adjacent

    Baemdok SYN-AKE sheet mask received free from a retailer for review

Research notes, not medical advice. Updated .

Sequence

The peptide's chain of amino acids from its start (the N-terminus) to its end, one bead and one letter for each: A alanine, C cysteine, D aspartic acid, E glutamic acid, F phenylalanine, G glycine, H histidine, I isoleucine, K lysine, L leucine, M methionine, N asparagine, P proline, Q glutamine, R arginine, S serine, T threonine, V valine, W tryptophan, Y tyrosine. A modification such as an N-acetyl cap or a C-terminal amide changes how long it lasts in the body. Length tells related peptides apart, from a two-residue dipeptide like carnosine to a 43-residue protein like thymosin beta-4, and predicts neither effect nor safety.

Report grades

Every first-hand Reddit or X report is graded on its own, from glowing through positive, mixed, nothing and negative to bad reaction, and the bar shows how those grades split. Posts that look vendor-adjacent stay on the peptide's page but are left out of the counts.

GlowingPositiveMixedNothingNegativeBad reaction

% positive

The share of a peptide's graded Reddit and X reports that are glowing or positive, vendor-adjacent posts left out. A peptide with few reports is pulled toward the average of all reports, as if it had eight average ones besides its own, so two glowing posts cannot top the list. Peptides rank by this figure, those with no graded report yet after those with one, and Avoid ones after every other entry.

Researcher estimate

No first-hand report of this peptide has been graded yet, so the figure is the researchers' own rating out of 10 from what they read about it. It ranks after every peptide with graded reports until its own arrive.

Safety tier

Each peptide is tiered Clean, Caution or Avoid from its five risk axes under the chosen safety bar. An Avoid peptide carries a real risk of harm, a plausible route to serious harm rather than mere unpleasantness, so it stays listed with the reason but ranks behind every other entry, however good its reviews.

Safety bar

The safety bar sets how much risk it takes to rate a peptide Avoid. Strict: out on any serious mechanism with little human data, or any documented serious harm. Balanced: out on documented serious harm (unless it is obvious, reversible and from a regulated product), or a serious mechanism whose harm would be silent with no human data at all. Evidence only: out only on documented serious harm in humans that is lasting, delayed or from grey-market product.

Seen harm

Documented serious adverse events in humans, from 0 for none despite real exposure to 3 for deaths or several well-documented serious harms. Serious means a hospital or emergency visit or harm lasting weeks, so a headache or a bad night does not count.

Mechanism

A plausible biological route to serious harm at the doses people use, such as growth-factor signalling, hormone-axis suppression, heart or blood-pressure effects or immune activation. It runs from 0 when none is known to 3 when a dangerous pathway has been shown in living animals.

Data gap

How little human safety data exists for the molecule actually sold, from 0 for an approved drug with large trials and years of use to 3 for no human safety data at all. A modified analogue does not inherit its parent's trials.

Silent harm

Whether the feared harm would show quickly or stay hidden, from 0 when it is obvious and goes on stopping to 3 when it is silent and delayed, like tumour promotion or slow organ damage. User reports cannot reveal a harm that takes years to appear, so a high score here limits what good reviews can tell you.

Product

The risk of what people actually buy, from 0 for a regulated pharmacy or supplement product taken by mouth or on the skin to 3 for a grey-market injectable. In one dataset of 6,441 grey-market samples, 42–71% failed basic quality criteria and 15% carried endotoxin; taken by mouth or in the nose, a pack avoids the injection risks.

Evidence

The strongest kind of study behind the peptide's effects, from an approved drug through human controlled trials and small human studies to animal work or nothing of its own. Animal results often fail to carry over to people.

Access

How people get it: as an approved drug, a compounded prescription, an over-the-counter supplement or from the grey market, where nobody checks the vial. The channel decides both the legal position and the risk of a bad batch.

Price per month

Thirty days of the typical dose, from its low end to its high end, priced at the listing a careful buyer would choose: in stock, from a shop scoring 4 of 5 on trust (third-party tested where no score is set), failing that 3, a pure pack before a blend, a European shop first, then the cheapest per mg. The range is the dose's, not the shops'. A per-dose amount counts once a day unless the dose says otherwise. The shop table keeps each listing's price per mg, per gram for bulk supplements. Where no listing can be priced the researchers' own estimate stands in, and says so.

Dose users report

The middle half of the daily doses stated in at least five first-hand reports, vendor posts left out. Where its middle sits more than twice above or below the declared dose, the month is priced at it as well, since what people take is what they pay for.

Shop trust

Each shop's trust on a 1–5 scale, read from its testing and its reputation: 1 for serious red flags (fabricated COAs, scam reports, impersonation, a closed shop), 2 for no public testing, a new shop or active complaints such as seized parcels, 3 for its own COAs or a short track record, 4 for verified third-party testing or a strong reputation, and 5 for third-party batch reports that name the shop, with years of good independent reputation. A shop without a score counts third-party batch testing as 4, its own COAs as 3 and no public tests as 2.

Best value

Within a category or a goal, a peptide that no other beats on both counts: none is rated more positively for the same or a lower monthly price, and none costs less for the same or a higher rating. The chart joins these into the best-value line; the cheapest of them and the best-rated of them both make it, so the line spans the trade-off from cheap to best. Avoid entries never count, and a peptide needs both a % positive and a price to be compared.

Testing

Whether the shop publishes lab results: third-party tested means an independent lab checks each batch, own COA means the shop's own certificate of analysis, and no public tests means neither. A certificate shows purity, not safety.

Added peptide

Some packs sold under one peptide's name hold a second one, such as 5 mg GHK-Cu in a nasal kit, stated only in the description. Sprayed in the nose or injected it reaches the blood like an injection, so it carries the risk of that route and is tiered as the injectable form, whatever its tier on the skin. A pack whose page gives no contents list may hold more than its name.